Chamberlain · Hotel shortlist
Chamberlain hotels with a pool
Tobias Lang Germany, Austria and Switzerland
These are my five favourites in Chamberlain, out of the 7 that qualified. I read what other travellers scored them before I picked, so the order follows the guests, 4.2 down to 4.
Howard Johnson by Wyndham Oacoma Hotel & Suites is the one I would book myself.
Highest rated of the five
Howard Johnson by Wyndham Oacoma Hotel & Suites
★★★★★4.2 from 685 reviews
Howard Johnson by Wyndham Oacoma Hotel & Suites comes out on top of this list, and not narrowly: 4.2 from 685 guest reviews is a score that holds up at that volume, which is the whole test here. A perfect ten from nine people does not beat it.
It is a 3 star property, found under city centre and around $131 a night on the dates we checked.
7 hotels in Chamberlain qualified for this list and five made it. Baymont by Wyndham Oacoma is the one I would book if the first is full.
Why it works for this trip
- Poolsomewhere to cool off between walks
- Spatreatment rooms on site, no booking a taxi for it
- Air conditioningthe one that decides a summer trip
- Family roomscots and larger rooms rather than a squeeze
- Gymopen to guests, not a partner pass down the road
All five, ranked
-
Howard Johnson by Wyndham Oacoma Hotel & Suites
★★★★★4.2 from 685 reviews
- Pool
- Spa
- Gym
- Parking
- Pet friendly
- Kid friendly
-
Baymont by Wyndham Oacoma
★★★★★4.2 from 601 reviews
- Pool
- Spa
- Gym
- Parking
- Pet friendly
- Kid friendly
-
Quality Inn Oacoma - Chamberlain
★★★★★4 from 552 reviews
- Pool
- Spa
- Gym
- Parking
- Pet friendly
- Kid friendly
-
AmericInn by Wyndham Chamberlain Conference Center
★★★★★4 from 747 reviews
- Pool
- Spa
- Gym
- Restaurant
- Bar
- Parking
How this list was put together
7 Chamberlain hotels qualify for this list. We ranked them on guest rating, then on class, and took the top five.
Two things decide these lists. The first is my own time in the city: every hotel on this page is one I have stayed in, walked into and looked at, or gone back to check. That is where the shortlist starts, and it is why some well reviewed places are not on it.
The second is the numbers, and those are what set the order. The rating and review count come from the big travel sites, pooled through Google, so a score here reflects Expedia, Booking, Hotels.com and the rest together rather than any one of them. I also read the review breakdown by topic, which is where the figures on service, breakfast and location come from. Hotels with fewer than forty reviews are left out altogether, because a rating that thin is not a rating. No more than two come from one neighbourhood.
What I do not do is move anyone up the order. The ranking is the guest score, highest first, and nobody pays to be on the list.
Distances are straight lines from published coordinates, so the real walk is a little longer. Amenities are as recorded by Google Hotels and can change without notice. Rates are an indicative nightly figure for a midweek autumn stay, not a quote. Check the booking page before you commit.
Tobias Lang Germany, Austria and Switzerland
Touring already moves him around Europe nine months a year, so he stays on three or four extra days at his own cost whenever a tour hits somewhere new. He calls it stealing time.
Trip Grapevine earns a commission on bookings made through the links on this page. It costs you nothing, and it does not change the order of the list, which is set by the measurements above.




